What was established in R v. Court (1989) regarding perceptions of sexual acts?

In R v. Court (1989), the court established that the perception of an act as sexual is significant, particularly when evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable person. This ruling underscored the importance of societal standards and perceptions in determining whether an act can be classified as sexual, regardless of the intent behind it or its physical nature.

The case highlighted that the subjective views of the victim or the perpetrator are not the sole factors; instead, it is the response of "right-minded" individuals that matters. This criterion helps navigate the complexities of sexual offences by providing a standard that reflects societal norms and expectations regarding sexual conduct.

The other options lack the foundational aspect established by the court. For instance, it is not solely about physical harm or intent that defines sexual behavior, but rather the community's understanding of the act in question. Additionally, the admissibility of drawings or explicit content as evidence is separate from the interpretation of acts as sexual, which centralizes around public perception aligned with the ruling in R v. Court.