In the case of R v. Gillard (1988), what act of poisoning is highlighted?

The case of R v. Gillard (1988) highlights the criminality associated with the act of spraying poison directly into someone's face. This method demonstrates a clear intent to harm the victim, as it involves a direct and deliberate application of poison. The fact that the poison was projected in such a manner underscores the aggressive nature of the act and the seriousness of the intention behind it.

In the context of criminal law, such an approach to poisoning represents a physical attack that can lead to severe legal consequences for the perpetrator, as it goes beyond mere negligence or accidental harm, which could be found in other options. By focusing on the method of delivery—an overt act of spraying—it accentuates the culpability involved in using poison as a weapon against an individual. This case serves as an important reference point in the legal landscape concerning acts of violence and the use of harmful substances.